Trump argues for the elimination of federal waterways oversight | Veazey Felder & Renegar LLC
Veazey Felder & Renegar LLC
Lafayette Office

Tradition Based. Technology Proficient Client & Community Focused

Trump argues for the elimination of federal waterways oversight

On Dec. 12, 2017, the Trump administration announced plans to reduce federal oversight over tributary and wetlands pollution. This marked a big win for farmers, fracking companies and builders who have been forced to adhere to the Clean Water Act (CWA) regulations regarding waste and water usage for decades.

During Trump's run for the presidency, he mentioned that one of his top priorities upon taking office would be to order that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) eliminate the Waters of the United States rule.

That rule, which served as an extension of the 1972 CWA, was instituted in 2015 during the Obama administration. Under it, the EPA was required to closely monitor any stormwater controls, wetlands, ditches, streams and lakes that fed into larger waterways.

When questioned about Trump's motivation to pull back on the CWA, one of his advisors noted that it gave Washington too much control over privately owned property. He also pointed out that the regulatory oversight that began under the Obama administration was far too time-consuming and costly than it needed to be.

Those who oppose the proposal have expressed concern that sand or gravel pits and old quarries used for fracking in the oil and gas industry will fill up with water. They've said that they fear how mountaintops, which are generally cut off to store coal mining waste, will become filled with water -- eventually creating toxic ponds. They've also inquired about how much fertilizer will be introduced to other bodies of water.

As for the oil and gas industry, the American Petroleum Institute had previously expressed their discontentment with the 2015 rule. They'd argued that it imposed so many burdensome regulatory oversight and costs that it had greatly affected their ability to produce energy. They also said that its implementation had very little positive impact on the environment.

Legislators in Washington will be given a 60-day comment period from the day the proposal was announced on Dec. 12 to provide feedback on it.

Anyone who works in the oil and gas industry is keenly aware of how locating and then tapping deposits can give way to legal issues. This is why it's essential for you to ally with an oil and gas law attorney who is experienced in handling disputes over royalties, property transactions and environmental damage matters.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Contact Our Firm

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Our Awards & Affiliations

  • Top Lawyers Of Acadiana 2020 | Acadiana Profile Magazine
  • Top Lawyers Of Acadiana 2017 | Acadiana Profile Magazine
  • AV - Lexis Nexis - Martindale Hubbell - Peer review rated - For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability
  • Super Lawyers
  • NFIB - The voice of small Business
  • Top Lawyer
  • Top Lawyers Of Acadiana 2016 | Acadiana Profile Magazine